Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (56)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HANNA, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by FUNG, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HANNA, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by FUNG, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1991, Vol. 66, No. 1 103-107
© 1991 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

DISPOSITION OF MORPHINE-6-GLUCURONIDE AND MORPHINE IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS

M. H. HANNA, F.C.ANAES., S. J. PEAT, B.SC., F.C.ANAES., A. A. KNIBB, F.C.ANAES. and C. FUNG, PH.D.

Pain Relief Research Unit, Kings College Hospital, School of Medicine and Dentistry Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS

Correspondence to M. H. H.

The pharmacokinetics and subjective side effects of i.v. morphine sulphate 120 µg kg–1 and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) 30 µg kg–1 were determined in six healthy volunteers, using a placebo-controlled, single-blind randomized crossover design. Five of these volunteers underwent an additional (non-randomized) study of M6G 60 µg kg–1. Subjective side effects were similar following both drugs, but of shorter duration following M6G. Morphine was not detected after administration of M6G. For M6G 30 µg kg–1 the mean (SD) volume of distribution, elimination half-life and clearance were 29.38 (18.36) litre, 2.05 (1.2) h and 187.81 (37.41) litre h–1, respectively. These values were not significantly different from those obtained for M6G 60 µg kg–1. In all subjects the volumes of distribution and clearances were significantly smaller for M6G than for morphine, but the elimination half-lives were similar.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. J. Bouwmeester, B. J. Anderson, D. Tibboel, and N. H. G. Holford
Developmental pharmacokinetics of morphine and its metabolites in neonates, infants and young children
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2004; 92(2): 208 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
D. Wu, Y.-S. Kang, U. Bickel, and W. M. Pardridge
Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability to Morphine-6-Glucuronide is Markedly Reduced Compared with Morphine
Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 1997; 25(6): 768 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.