Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MILLAR, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by TENNANT, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MILLAR, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by TENNANT, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1989, Vol. 62, No. 2 153-158
© 1989 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

COMPARISON OF THE MAGILL AND LACK ANAESTHETIC BREATHING SYSTEMS IN ANAESTHETIZED PATIENTS

S. W. MILLAR, F.F.A.R.C.S.*, P. K. BARNES, F.F.A.R.C.S., N. SONI, F.F.A.R.A.C.S. and R. TENNANT, F.I.S.T.

Magill Department of Anaesthetics, Westminster Hospital London SW1P 2AP

The Magill and Lack anaesthetic breathing systems were compared by measuring inspired and expired carbon dioxide concentrations and expired minute volumes in lightly anaesthetized, unstimulated subjects. There were no significant differences between the two breathing systems at fresh gas flow rates of approximately 50 and 70 ml kg–1 min–1. Inspired carbon dioxide concentrations increased in one of six subjects at the higher fresh gas flow rate using the Magill system and in two using the Lack system. Inspired carbon dioxide concentration did not increase in only one of six subjects at the lower fresh gas flow rate with both systems. Expired carbon dioxide concentrations and expired minute volume increased in the majority of subjects at both fresh gas flow rates using each system. We conclude that a fresh gas flow rate greater than 70 ml kg–1 min–1 (which approximated to alveolar minute volume in our subjects) should be supplied to the Magill and Lack breathing systems.

*Present address: Burton General Hospital, New Street, Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire DE14 3QH.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.