British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1989, Vol. 62, No. 2 138-143
© 1989 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
research-article |
COMPARISON OF 1.5% ENFLURANE WITH 1.25% ISOFLURANE IN OXYGEN FOR CAESAREAN SECTION: AVOIDANCE OF AWARENESS WITHOUT NITROUS OXIDE
Department of of Anaesthetics, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB9 2ZB
We examined the feasibility of administering nearly 100% oxygen throughout the induction-delivery period of general anaesthesia for 113 Caesarean sections. Isoflurane 1.25% was compared with 1.5% enflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia. The level of anaesthesia was monitored by use of the isolated forearm technique. There was a greater amount of isolated forearm movement when enflurane was used. The three main criteria for a satisfactory general anaesthetic technique for Caesarean section were fulfilled, namely no maternal awareness, no undue depression of the fetus and no adverse effect on uterine contractility. Isoflurane and enflurane appear to be suitable anaesthetic agents for facilitating hyper-oxygenation during Caesarean section.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. R. Gaiser, C. D. Kurth, D. Cohen, and T. Crombleholme The Cesarean Delivery of a Twin Gestation Under 2 Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration Isoflurane: One Normal and One with a Large Neck Mass Anesth. Analg., March 1, 1999; 88(3): 584 - 584. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
