Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CARSON, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by REYNOLDS, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CARSON, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by REYNOLDS, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1988, Vol. 61, No. 3 332-337
© 1988 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

MATERNAL-FETAL DISTRIBUTION OF BUPIVACAINE IN THE RABBIT

R. J. CARSON, B.SC. and F. REYNOLDS, M.D., F.F.A.R.C.S.

Anaesthetic Unit, St Thomas' Hospital London SE1 7EH

Bupivacaine was infused i.v. in nine anaesthetized pregnant rabbit does near term. Pups were removed at 10–15 min intervals and bupivacaine concentrations measured in fetal plasma, brain, placenta, amniotic fluid, maternal plasma sampled synchronously and maternal brain at the end of the experiment. Mean maximum fetal: maternal (F: M) ratio was 0.31 (SD 0.16) (range 0.18–0.64). Mean fetal brain: plasma ratios ranged from 2.04 to 5.09. There was no progressive increase in fetal brain bupivacaine concentration with time. Maternal brain: plasma ratio was 1.62 (0.81). However, maximum fetal brain concentration was only 0.27–0.86 of maternal. Concentrations increased with time in amniotic fluid, but did not exceed those in maternal plasma. Although there was some accumulation of bupivacaine in rabbit fetuses, tissue uptake could not account for low F: M ratios persisting beyond 80 min.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.