Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MACKENZIE, N.
Right arrow Articles by GRANT, I. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MACKENZIE, N.
Right arrow Articles by GRANT, I. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985, Vol. 57, No. 8 725-731
© 1985 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

COMPARISION OF THE NEW EMULSION FORMULATION OF PROPOFOL WITH METHOHEXITONE AND THIOPENTONE FOR INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA IN DAY CASES

N. MACKENZIE, M.B., CH.B., F.F.A.R.C.S and I. S. GRANT, M.B., CH.B., M.R.C.P., F.F.A.R.C.S

Department of Anaesthetics, Ninewells Teaching Hospital Dundee

The new emulsion formulation of di-isopropyl phenol (propofol) was compared with metho-hexitone and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia in day cases. Propofol produced significantly smoresearch-article induction of anaesthesia, but caused more cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Pain on injection was significantly less than with methohexitone. Post-anaesthetic recovery was superior with propofol, with virtual absence of side effects, and rapid recovery with little impairment of psychomotor function 30 min after anaesthesia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.