Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GOODMAN, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by BLACK, A. M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GOODMAN, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by BLACK, A. M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985, Vol. 57, No. 3 319-325
© 1985 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

ANALYSES OF THE VENTILATORY RESPONSE TO CARBON DIOXIDE

Implications for Clinical Research

N. W. GOODMAN, M.A., D.PHIL., B.M., B.CH., F.F.A.R.C.S. and A. M. S. BLACK, M.A., D.PHIL., B.M., B.CH., F.F.A.R.A.C.S.

Department of Anaesthesia, Bristol Royal Infirmary Briston BS2 8HW

Baseline control estimations of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide by the rebreathing method were attempted in 92 patients. When analysed retrospectively, only 53 were both technically and statistically satisfactory, although even these gave rise to some doubts. As the breath-bybreath correlation between ventilation (Vi) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (PE'CO2 decreased there was a tendency for the gradients to become suspiciously low and for the estimates in an individual gradient to become sensitive to the method of analysis. Even so, when responses were grouped according to correlation, the method of analysis did not alter the mean gradient within a group. Single estimates of the carbon dioxide response at each stage of a study may not be a very powerful technique in clinical research; multiple estimates, if they can be arranged, would be more satisfactory.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.