Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by REDFERN, N.
Right arrow Articles by HULL, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by REDFERN, N.
Right arrow Articles by HULL, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985, Vol. 57, No. 12 1178-1182
© 1985 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

other

INCREMENTAL PROPOFOL FOR SHORT PROCEDURES

N. REDFERN, M. A. STAFFORD and C. J. HULL

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Royal Victoria Infirmary Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP.

Propofol was used to induce and maintain anaesthesia in patients undergoing minor gynaecological procedures. Quality of anaesthesia, the rate of recovery and the influence of different methods of premedication were assessed. Unpremedicated patients required a higher induction dose than those premedicated with either lorazepam or papaveretum and hyoscine, but maintenance dose requirements were comparable. Regardless of premedication, there were similar decreases in mean arterial pressure, although respiratory function recovered more rapidly in patients premedicated with lorazepam. No significant changes in heart rate were noted in any group. The overall incidence of pain on injection was 3.7% {lignocaine 0.5mg added to each 9.5 mg of propofol) and a skin rash occurred in 6 % of patients. All patients recovered rapidly and uneventfully.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. Orsini, A. Nadkarni, J. Chen, and N. Cohen
Propofol infusion syndrome: Case report and literature review
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 15, 2009; 66(10): 908 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.