Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JESSOP, E.
Right arrow Articles by LUMLEY, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JESSOP, E.
Right arrow Articles by LUMLEY, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985, Vol. 57, No. 12 1173-1177
© 1985 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

other

COMPARISON OF INFUSIONS OF PROPOFOL AND METHOHEXITONE TO PROVIDE LIGHT GENERAL ANAESTHESIA DURING SURGERY WITH REGIONAL BLOCKADE

E. JESSOP, R. M. GROUNDS, M. MORGAN and J. LUMLEY

Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital DuCane Road, London W12 OHS

Correspondence to J. L.

General anaesthesia was induced with, and maintained by, an infusion of either propofol or methohexitone, in patients undergoing surgery with the aid of regional blockade. Both agents provided satisfactory and controllable anaesthesia. Complications were few with a similar incidence for the two drugs. Recovery from anaesthesia was significantly faster following propofol.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. M. Sa Rego, Y. Inagaki, and P. F. White
The Cost-Effectiveness of Methohexital Versus Propofol for Sedation During Monitored Anesthesia Care
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 1999; 88(4): 723 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.