Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HENEGHAN, C. P. H.
Right arrow Articles by JONES, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HENEGHAN, C. P. H.
Right arrow Articles by JONES, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985, Vol. 57, No. 12 1161-1166
© 1985 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


other

PULMONARY GAS EXCHANGE AND DIAPHRAGMATIC POSITION

Effect of Tonic Phrenic Stimulation Compared with that of Increased Airway Pressure

C. P. H. HENEGHAN and J. G. JONES

Division of Anaesthesia, Clinical Research Centre Watford Road, Harrow, Middx.

The influence of diaphragmatic position on abnormal gas exchange has been examined to investigate the theory that the impairment in gas exchange in anaesthetized man is caused by disturbance of diaphragmatic mechanics, resulting in abnormalities of dependent lung ventilation. A gas exchange abnormality, probably caused by airway closure in the dependent regions of the lung, was induced in anaesthetized rabbits by reducing lung volume to residual volume and allowing passive re-expansion. The effects on gas exchange of increases in lung volume produced by two methods–the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS)–were compared. Both methods were adjusted to give the same increase in lung volume. PNS was found to produce greater caudal movement of the diaphragm than PEEP, particularly in the dependent regions. PNS also improved gas exchange significantly more than PEEP. These findings support the theory that alterations in diaphragmatic mechanics during anaesthesia contribute to the gas exchange impairment in man.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.