Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KORTTILA, K.
Right arrow Articles by LINNOILA, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KORTTILA, K.
Right arrow Articles by LINNOILA, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1976, Vol. 48, No. 4 333-340
© 1976 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

PROLONGED RECOVERY AFTER DIAZEPAM SEDATION: THE INFLUENCE OF FOOD, CHARCOAL INGESTION AND INJECTION RATE ON THE EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS DIAZEPAM

K. KORTTILA, M.D., M. J. MATTTLA, M.D. and M. LINNOILA, M.D.J

Department of Anaesthesia
Department of Pharmacology; University of Helsinki Siltavuorenpenger 10 A, SF–00170 Helsinki 17, Finland.

Correspondence to: Kari Korttila, M.D., Department of Pharmacology.

Thirteen subjects received diazepam 0.3 mg/kg i.v. twice with a 2–week interval between the doses. In seven subjects who had eaten at 3 h after the injection, reactive skills in a choice reaction test were impaired significantly (P< 0.05) and there was a 20% increase in the serum diazepam concentrations at 5 h. When the meal was eaten at 7 h, a 50% increase (P<0.01) in the serum diazepam concentration was not associated with a significant impairment in psychomotor skills. In a second group of six subjects charcoal ingestion failed to hasten the clearance of diazepam from serum, and did not affect recovery of co-ordinative skills. In a third group of 12 subjects receiving diazepam 0.15 mg/kg i.v. twice at an interval of 2 weeks, the rapid injection of diazepam resulted in a significantly greater (P < 0.05) degree of drooping of the upper eyelid and in a greater incidence of amnesia to abdominal pinching. The subjects also experienced more pain in the arm during the faster injection (P<0.01). Late effects on psychomotor skills were similar with both rates of injection. The results suggest that the immobilization of diazepam from its storage site after food intake induces a late impairment of psychomotor skills, especially if the food is eaten within less rhnn 5 h after the injection. A rapid i.v. injection of diazepam induces greater sedative and amnesic effects than a slow injection of the same dose, but the slow injection of a greater dose is preferable because of the possibility of thrombophlebitis after rapid injection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
L.J. Peterson
Clinical Assessment of New I.V. Sedation Agents and Techniques
Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 1984; 63(6): 838 - 841.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
K. Korttila
Clinical Effectiveness and Untoward Effects of New Agents and Techniques Used in Intravenous Sedation
Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 1984; 63(6): 848 - 852.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.