Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GOLD, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by RUY, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GOLD, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by RUY, B. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1966, Vol. 38, No. 5 380-385
© 1966 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

EFFICACY OF THIETHYLPERAZINE AS A RECOVERY ROOM ANTI-EMETIC

MARTIN I. GOLD and BLODEMIR P. RUY*

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and University Hospital U.S.A.

Of approximately 3,500 recovery room patients, 5 per cent vomited one or more times. Either thiethylperazine or placebo was then administered in double-blind style, and both agents were approximately 60 per cent successful after one injection. However, 56 per cent of a similar series of (untreated) recovery room patients vomited only once. Of those vomiting twice, 30 per cent were successfully treated, a significantly higher success rate resulting from the use of thiethylperazine. Only 4 per cent of those vomiting three times stopped after drug administration. Since almost two-thirds of the victims vomited once only and one-fourth persisted despite continued therapy, only 15 per cent of all recovery room vomiters (1 per cent of all patients entering the recovery room) demonstrated the superiority of the active agent over saline. It is suggested that active therapy be delayed in recovery room vomiting until the second vomiting incident, and that for those who persist a physiologic aberration be sought and that either this be corrected or a search for a more potent anti-emetic be initiated.

*Present address: Mercy Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.