Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on October 28, 2009
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009 103(6):800-804; doi:10.1093/bja/aep296
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/6/800    most recent
aep296v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thom, O.
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thom, O.
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournal.org

Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter

O. Thom1,*, D. M. Taylor2, R. E. Wolfe3, J. Cade3, P. Myles4, H. Krum5 and R. Wolfe5

1 Box Hill Hospital, Nelson Road, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
2 Austin Health, Australia
3 Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia
4 Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Australia
5 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia

* Corresponding author. E-mail: ogilvie.thom{at}med.monash.edu.au

Background: Cardiac output (CO) cannot reliably be estimated by clinical examination. We aimed to measure the agreement between CO measurements using a supra-sternal Doppler monitor (USCOM, Coffs Harbour, Australia) and the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC).

Methods: The study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital. All patients with PAC in situ were eligible. Simultaneous CO readings were taken when clinically indicated. Investigators and clinicians were blinded to each other's results. The CO values used were the mean of three consecutive supra-sternal Doppler readings for patients with a sinus rhythm and seven for atrial fibrillation, and the mean of three thermodilution curves with acceptable form and values within 10% of each other for the PAC. Agreement was measured using both the paired t-test to calculate bias and limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient.

Results: Ninety-four subjects were enrolled. From 89 subjects, 250 paired comparisons were obtained. USCOM monitor readings were unobtainable in five patients. Mean supra-sternal Doppler CO was 5.5 litre min–1. Bias was –0.09 litre min–1 and levels of agreement were ± 2.92 litre min–1 when compared with PAC. ICC was 0.46 (95% CI 0.36–0.56), and mean percentage difference was 19 (IQR 6–31)%.

Conclusions: In our subjects, there was poor agreement between CO measurements done with the supra-sternal Doppler monitor and PAC.

Keywords: heart, cardiac output; measurement techniques, cardiac output; monitoring, intensive care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.