BJA Advance Access originally published online on July 23, 2009
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009 103(3):346-351; doi:10.1093/bja/aep200
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively
1 Department of Anaesthesiology, General Intensive Care and Pain Control and
2 Core Unit for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Section of Clinical, Biometrics, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringerguertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
3 Department of Anaesthesiology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
* Corresponding author. E-mail: daniel.lahner{at}meduniwien.ac.at
Background: Fluid management guided by oesophageal Doppler monitor has been reported to improve perioperative outcome. Stroke volume variation (SVV) is considered a reliable clinical predictor of fluid responsiveness. Consequently, the aim of the present trial was to evaluate the accuracy of SVV determined by arterial pulse contour (APCO) analysis, using the FloTracTM/VigileoTM system, to predict fluid responsiveness as measured by the oesophageal Doppler.
Methods: Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery received intraoperative fluid management guided by oesophageal Doppler monitoring. Fluid boluses of 250 ml each were administered in case of a decrease in corrected flow time (FTc) to <350 ms. Patients were connected to a monitoring device, obtaining SVV by APCO. Haemodynamic variables were recorded before and after fluid bolus application. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in stroke volume index >10%. The ability of SVV to predict fluid responsiveness was assessed by calculation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results: Twenty patients received 67 fluid boluses. Fifty-two of the 67 fluid boluses administered resulted in fluid responsiveness. SVV achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.512 [confidence interval (CI) 0.32–0.70]. A cut-off point for fluid responsiveness was found for SVV
8.5% (sensitivity: 77%; specificity: 43%; positive predictive value: 84%; and negative predictive value: 33%).
Conclusions: This prospective, interventional observer-blinded study demonstrates that SVV obtained by APCO, using the FloTracTM/VigileoTM system, is not a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in the setting of major abdominal surgery.
Keywords: fluid balance; measurement techniques, cardiac output; monitoring, arterial pressure; monitoring, cardiopulmonary
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Cannesson, B. Vallet, F. Michard, D. Lahner, E. Fleischmann, H. Hetz, G. Pestel, G. Gouvea, R. Diaz, L. Auler, et al. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation: from flying blind to flying right? Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2009; 103(6): 896 - 899. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
E-letters:
Read all E-letters
- Pulse Pressure Variation and Stroke Volume Variation: from Flying Blind to Flying Right?
- Maxime Cannesson, et al.
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1 Sep 2009 [Full text]
- Re: Pulse Pressure Variation and Stroke Volume Variation: from Flying Blind to Flying Right?
- Glauber Gouvêa
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 21 Sep 2009 [Full text]
- From the quest for the ‘holy grail’ of fluid responsiveness
- Daniel Lahner, et al.
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 21 Sep 2009 [Full text]
