Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on December 9, 2008
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009 102(2):240-243; doi:10.1093/bja/aen352
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/240    most recent
aen352v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJA
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ioscovich, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ioscovich, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Conversion of epidural labour analgesia to anaesthesia for Caesarean section: a prospective study of the incidence and determinants of failure

S. H. Halpern1,*, A. Soliman1, J. Yee1, P. Angle1 and A. Ioscovich2

1 Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1B2
2 Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

* Corresponding author. E-mail: stephen.halpern{at}sunnybrook.ca

Background: The incidence of general anaesthesia (GA) has been used as a marker for the quality of obstetric anaesthesia care. Recent guidelines suggest the rate of GA for Caesarean section in parturients with pre-existing epidural analgesia for labour should be <3%. The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether or not this is an achievable standard in a university teaching hospital. We also wished to determine the factors influencing the incidence of inadequate anaesthesia.

Methods: We studied a consecutive cohort of 501 patients who had a Caesarean section after epidural labour analgesia. The incidence of GA, the total incidence of failure, and the factors previously associated with failure were recorded. Factors shown to be significant with univariate analysis were used in a binary logistic regression to determine the independent risk factors for failure.

Results: Twenty-one of 501 parturients required GA (4.1%, 95% confidence interval 2.6–6.3%), not significantly different from 3% (P=0.1). Fifteen of 21 (71%) of these occurred intraoperatively. The total rate of failure was 30/501 (5.9%, 95% confidence interval 4.0–8.4%). Maternal height and the number of clinician top-ups in labour were the significant independent risk factors for failure.

Conclusions: Intraoperative conversion to GA may increase both maternal and fetal risks. Strategies to reduce the incidence may include early recognition of inadequate labour analgesia and reliable assessment of adequacy of surgical anaesthesia.

Keywords: anaesthesia, obstetric; anaesthetic techniques, epidural; analgesic techniques, extradural; analgesia, obstetric; Caesarean section


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in BJA:

In the February 2009 BJA ...

BJA 2009 102: NP. [Extract] [Full Text]  



E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Labour epidural analgesia to epidural anaesthesia for emergency caesarean sections
Pavan K Bangalore Chandrashekara Raju
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 17 Jan 2009 [Full text]
Labour epidural analgesia to epidural anaesthesia for emergency caesarean sections
Stephen H. Halpern
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 22 Jan 2009 [Full text]
Conversion of epidural labour analgesia to anaesthesia for Caesarean section
James M Shannon, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 22 Jan 2009 [Full text]
Conversion of epidural labour analgesia to anaesthesia for CS
Parag Shastri, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1 Apr 2009 [Full text]
Possible reasons for failed conversion of epidural analgesia into anaesthesia
Niraj Sinha
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 21 Jul 2009 [Full text]

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.