Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on April 8, 2008
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008 100(6):787-791; doi:10.1093/bja/aen077
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/6/787    most recent
aen077v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coburn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rossaint, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coburn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rossaint, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Incidence of postoperative nausea and emetic episodes after xenon anaesthesia compared with propofol-based anaesthesia

M. Coburn1,*,{dagger},{ddagger}, O. Kunitz2,{dagger}, C. C. Apfel3, M. Hein1, M. Fries1 and R. Rossaint1,{ddagger}

1 Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Aachen of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstreet 30, D-52072 Aachen, Germany
2 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen Medical Centre, Trier, Germany
3 Perioperative Clinical Research Core, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

* Corresponding author. E-mail: mcoburn{at}ukaachen.de

Background: Xenon has been proved to be safe and efficacious for general anaesthesia in numerous trials. In addition, experimental studies demonstrate that xenon inhibits the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor. As 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are known to decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) to an extent comparable with a propofol-based total i.v. technique, we tested the hypothesis that general anaesthesia with xenon would result in a reduced incidence of PONV similar to that observed with propofol-based anaesthesia.

Methods: After obtaining approval from the local ethics committee and written informed consent, 142 patients were randomized to receive xenon anaesthesia or propofol-based total i.v. anaesthesia (TIVA), both supplemented with remifentanil. The incidence of postoperative nausea and emetic episodes was recorded in the post-anaesthesia care unit and on the ward more than 24 h after anaesthesia.

Results: A total of 142 patients were equally distributed between the xenon and TIVA groups. Anaesthesia was maintained with mean (SD) concentrations of either xenon 61 (2)% or propofol 100 (20) µg kg–1 min–1. Incidences of nausea and emetic episodes over the whole 24-h period were 66.2% and 35.2% in the xenon group and 26.8% and 16.9% in the TIVA group (P<0.001 and P<0.021).

Conclusion: Despite knowing the 5-HT3 antagonistic properties of xenon, its use is associated with a higher incidence of nausea and emetic episodes compared with TIVA with propofol.

Keywords: anaesthetics, xenon; anaesthetics, i.v., propofol; recovery, postoperative; vomiting, nausea, anaesthetic factors


{dagger} Drs M. Coburn and O. Kunitz contributed equally to this study.

{ddagger} Declaration of interest. Dr M. Coburn and Professor R. Rossaint are paid consultants of Air Liquide Santé International, a company interested in developing clinical applications for medical gases, including xenon.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.