Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on April 2, 2008
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008 100(5):683-689; doi:10.1093/bja/aen071
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/5/683    most recent
aen071v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svanström, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bålfors, E. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svanström, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bålfors, E. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Signs of myocardial ischaemia after injection of oxytocin: a randomized double-blind comparison of oxytocin and methylergometrine during Caesarean section

M. C. Svanström1, B. Biber3, M. Hanes3, G. Johansson3, U. Näslund2 and E. M. Bålfors4,*

1 Department of Thoracic Anaesthesiology
2 Department of Cardiology, Heart Centre
3 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Umeå University Hospital, SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden
4 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Söder Hospital, SE-118 83 Stockholm, Sweden

* Corresponding author: E-mail: eva.balfors{at}sodersjukhuset.se

Background: ECG changes, similar to those seen during myocardial ischaemia, together with symptoms of chest pain, are common during Caesarean section (CS). We hypothesized that oxytocin administration has cardiovascular effects leading to these symptoms and ECG changes.

Methods: Forty women undergoing elective CS under spinal anaesthesia were given an i.v. bolus of either 10 IU of oxytocin (Group OXY-CS, n=20) or 0.2 mg of methylergometrine (Group MET-CS, n=20), in a double-blind, randomized fashion after delivery. Ten healthy, non-pregnant, non-anaesthetized women were used as normal controls (Group OXY-NC, n=10) and were given 10 IU of oxytocin i.v. Twelve-lead ECG, on-line, computerized vectorcardiography (VCG), and invasive arterial pressure were recorded.

Results: Oxytocin produced a significant increase in heart rate, +28 (SD 4) and +52 (3) beats min–1 [mean (SEM); P<0.001], decreases in mean arterial pressure, –33 (2) and –30 (3) mm Hg (P<0.001), and increases in the spatial ST-change vector magnitude (STC-VM), +77 (12) and +114 (8) µV (P<0.001), in CS patients and controls, respectively. Symptoms of chest pain and subjective discomfort were simultaneously present. Methylergometrine produced mild hypertension and no significant ECG changes.

Conclusions: Oxytocin administered as an i.v. bolus of 10 IU induces chest pain, transient profound tachycardia, hypotension, and concomitant signs of myocardial ischaemia according to marked ECG and STC-VM changes. The effects are related to oxytocin administration and not to pregnancy, surgical procedure, delivery, or sympathetic block from spinal anaesthesia.

Keywords: heart, ischaemia; measurement techniques, arterial pressure; monitoring, vectorcardiography; obstetrics; uterus, oxytocin


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Cardiovascular effects of Oxytocin
Rakhee Kotak
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 4 May 2008 [Full text]
Myocardial ischaemia during Caesarean section.
Simone E Carbert
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 28 May 2008 [Full text]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.