Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on February 27, 2008
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008 100(4):457-464; doi:10.1093/bja/aen016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME/CE:
Take the course for this article:
BJA: April 2008
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/4/457    most recent
aen016v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mengistu, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mengistu, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of the effects of gelatin and a modern hydroxyethyl starch solution on renal function and inflammatory response in elderly cardiac surgery patients

J. Boldt*, Ch. Brosch, K. Röhm, M. Papsdorf and A. Mengistu

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany

* Corresponding author. E-mail: boldtj{at}gmx.net/ jboldt{at}gmx.net

Background: The effects of hydroxyethylstarch (HES) 130/0.4 6% and gelatin 4% on inflammation, endothelial integrity, and renal function after cardiac surgery were compared.

Methods: Sixty patients aged >80 yr undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized to receive gelatin (n=30) or HES 130/0.4 (n=30). The colloid was used in the priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit (500 ml) and for volume replacement until the second postoperative day (POD). Serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, IL-6, IL-10, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), urinary glutathione transferase-{alpha}, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were measured perioperatively. Serum creatinine was also reported ~60 days after discharge.

Results: The mean(SD) volume of gelatin infused was 4180(440) ml, which was greater than the volume of HES infused 2910(330) ml (P=0.002). The mean(SD) volume of serum creatinine on the first POD was 151(24) µmol litre–1 in the gelatin group and 126(13) µmol litre–1 in the HES group (P=0.004). Values for the second POD were 161(0.26) and 133(16) µmol litre–1, respectively (P=0.004). Creatinine clearance was lower in the gelatin group on the first POD [37(7) vs 46(8) ml min–1 1.73 m2 (P=0.004)] and the second POD [32(8) vs 45(10) ml min–1 1.73 m2 (P=0.002)]. Kidney function ~60 days after discharge did not differ between the groups. IL-6, IL-10, and sICAM-1 were significantly lower in the HES group than in the gelatin group on the first and second PODs. Urinary {alpha}-GST increased in both groups to a comparable extent. Urinary NGAL concentrations were higher in the gelatin than in the HES patients 5 h after surgery and on the first and second PODs.

Conclusions: In cardiac surgery patients aged >80 years, volume therapy with HES 130/0.4 6% was associated with less marked changes in kidney function and a less marked endothelial inflammatory response than gelatin 4%.

Keywords: cardiovascular system, effects; complications, renal; immune response; kidney, failure; surgery, cardiovascular


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
F. M. Brunkhorst, M. Oppert, M. Leone, V. Blasco, J. Albanese, and C. Martin
Nephrotoxicity of hydroxyethyl starch solution
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2008; 100(6): 856 - 857.
[Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Comparison of gelatin and a modern hydroxyethylstarch on renal function
Norman Kufakwaro
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 13 Apr 2008 [Full text]
Renal side effects of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in cardiac surgery
Ingemar J. Davidson
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 28 May 2008 [Full text]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.