Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008 100(2):154-164; doi:10.1093/bja/aem373
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME/CE:
Take the course for this article:
BJA: February 2008
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Myles, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Myles, P. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

S. J. Fowler1, J. Symons1, S. Sabato1 and P. S. Myles1,2,*

1 Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Prahran, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
2 Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

* Corresponding author. Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Prahran, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia. E-mail: p.myles{at}alfred.org.au

The relative analgesic efficacy and side-effect profile of peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) techniques compared with lumbar epidural analgesia for major knee surgery is unclear. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized trials comparing epidural analgesia with PNB for major knee surgery. Eight studies were identified that had enrolled a total of 510 patients of whom 464 (91%) had undergone total knee joint replacement. All were small trials and none was blinded (Jadad score 1–3). PNB technique was variable: in addition to a femoral catheter (n=5), femoral single shot (n=2), or lumbar plexus catheter (n=1) techniques, sciatic blockade was performed in three trials. There was no significant difference in pain scores between epidural and PNB at 0–12 or12–24 h, WMD 0.22 (95% CI: –0.36, 0.81), 0.05 (–1.01, 0.91), respectively, and no clinically significant difference at 24–48 h, WMD –0.35 (–0.64, –0.02). There was also no difference in morphine consumption (mg) at 0–24 h, WMD –6.25 (–18.35, 5.86). Hypotension occurred more frequently among patients who received epidurals [OR 0.19 (0.08, 0.45)], but there was no difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Two studies reported a higher incidence of urinary retention in the epidural group. Patient satisfaction was higher with PNB in two of three studies which measured this, although rehabilitation indices were similar. PNB with a femoral nerve block provides postoperative analgesia which is comparable with that obtained with an epidural technique but with an improved side-effect profile and is less likely to cause a severe neuraxial complication.

Keywords: anaesthetic techniques, epidural; anaesthetic techniques, regional; anaesthetic techniques, regional, knee; complications; surgery, orthopaedic


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. S. Kashyap, K. P. Anand, S. Kashyap, M. J. Moneypenny, S. J. Mercer, U. G. Longo, N. Maffulli, V. Denaro, and S. S. Leopold
Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty
N. Engl. J. Med., August 6, 2009; 361(6): 633 - 634.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. A. McLeod, J. Dale, D. Robinson, M. Checketts, M. O. Columb, J. Luck, C. Wigderowitz, and D. Rowley
Determination of the EC50 of levobupivacaine for femoral and sciatic perineural infusion after total knee arthroplasty
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2009; 102(4): 528 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. J. Mar, M. J. Barrington, and B. R. McGuirk
Acute compartment syndrome of the lower limb and the effect of postoperative analgesia on diagnosis
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2009; 102(1): 3 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. M. Popping, P. K. Zahn, H. K. Van Aken, B. Dasch, R. Boche, and E. M. Pogatzki-Zahn
Effectiveness and safety of postoperative pain management: a survey of 18 925 consecutive patients between 1998 and 2006 (2nd revision): a database analysis of prospectively raised data
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2008; 101(6): 832 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Re: Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery
Avine Lydon, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 13 Apr 2008 [Full text]
re: Periarticular analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
Steven J Fowler, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 23 Apr 2008 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.