Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on November 3, 2007
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008 100(1):55-65; doi:10.1093/bja/aem278
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/1/55    most recent
aem278v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assadi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Allaouchiche, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assadi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Allaouchiche, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effects of sodium nitroprusside on splanchnic microcirculation in a resuscitated porcine model of septic shock

A. Assadi1,3,*, O. Desebbe1,3, C. Kaminski1, T. Rimmelé1, F. Bénatir1, J. Goudable2, D. Chassard1 and B. Allaouchiche1

1 Department of Anaesthesia and
2 Laboratory of biochemistry, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 5, Place Arsonval, 69437 Lyon cedex 03, France
3 Laboratory of Pathophysiology of Anaesthesia EA 1896, University Claude Bernard, Lyon1, 8, avenue Rockefeller, 69373 Lyon, France

* Corresponding author: 210, rue Marcel Mérieux, 69007 Lyon, France. E-mail: assadinasser{at}yahoo.com

Background: We tested the hypothesis that sodium nitroprusside (SNP) might improve the impairment of hepatosplanchnic microcirculatory blood flow (MBF) in septic shock.

Methods: Fourteen pigs were anaesthetized and their lungs mechanically ventilated. Sepsis was induced with i.v. infusion of live Pseudomonas aeruginosa [1x108 colony forming units (CFU) ml–1 kg–1] for 1 h. Sixty minutes later, the animals received in a random succession either SNP or normal saline for 30 min. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), carbon dioxide tension of the ileal mucosa (PCO2; by gas tonometry), ileal mucosal and hepatic MBF by laser Doppler flowmetry, blood gases, and lactates were assessed before, during administration, and 30 min after discontinuing the test drug.

Results: Bacterial infusion promoted hypodynamic shock (MAP –18%, CI –33%, ileal MBF –19%, and hepatic MBF –27%), which was converted to normodynamic shock by resuscitation. During SNP infusion, ileal mucosal MBF significantly increased (+19%) compared with control (P = 0.033). Although hepatic MBF increased (+42% from baseline), this did not differ from control. In order to maintain a constant central venous pressure and MAP, fluid loading and norepinephrine (P < 0.01) were increased. Acid–base status was not altered by SNP.

Conclusions: In a resuscitated porcine model of the early phase of septic shock, SNP improved ileal mucosal MBF but required a concomitant increase in fluid and norepinephrine supplements to maintain constant systemic haemodynamic parameters.

Keywords: complications, infections, sepsis; gastrointestinal tract, mucosal perfusion; measurement techniques, laser Doppler flowmetry; pharmacology, nitroglycerin


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. G. Hardman, I. K. Moppett, and R. P. Mahajan
Validity, credibility, and applicability: the rise and rise of the surrogate
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2008; 101(5): 595 - 596.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.